The host in the video is a pro 2A attorney. The video is legalistic regarding tax being an infringement under 2A.
This finding, though, ultimately calls into question Pittman -Robertson. This is an ACT I think from the 1930s. It established an 11% tax on sporting goods, including guns and ammunition. The funds from P-R pay for many of the things we commonly accept, such as refuges and studies pertaining to wildlife and outdoor pursuits.
It is a state case, not federal so there is no immediate threat to P-R. However, the logic, I think, ultimately calls P-R into question.
This finding, though, ultimately calls into question Pittman -Robertson. This is an ACT I think from the 1930s. It established an 11% tax on sporting goods, including guns and ammunition. The funds from P-R pay for many of the things we commonly accept, such as refuges and studies pertaining to wildlife and outdoor pursuits.
It is a state case, not federal so there is no immediate threat to P-R. However, the logic, I think, ultimately calls P-R into question.
Comment